|
The cans and bottles that are recycled into new containers or
new products are easing the burden on the environment, but recycling
is clearly a "second-best" solution to our solid waste problems. Reuse
is a more environmentally responsible waste management option than
recycling, and thus precedes recycling in the solid waste reduction
hierarchy of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
Although approximately one-half of all beverage containers purchased
annually in the U.S. are recycled, Americans trash more than 270
million beer and soft drink containers every day.
The manufacturing of non-refillable, one-way glass, aluminum,
plastic and bi-metal containers is an energy intensive process that
depletes our mineral resources, pollutes air and water resources,
and generates millions of tons of post-consumer waste each year. Replacing
one-way beverage bottles and cans with refillable bottles conserves
energy and natural resources, and reduces waste at the source.
Several industry-funded studies confirm this fact. For example,
a 1989 study conducted for the National Association for Plastic Container
Recovery (since renamed the "National Association for PET Container
Resources"), found that a refillable glass bottle, used as few as
eight times, consumes less energy than any other container including
recycled containers. The study further found that the 16 ounce
refillable bottle produces the least amount of waterborne waste and
the fewest atmospheric emissions of all container types.
As recently as 1960, 95% of all packaged soft drinks and 53% of
all packaged beer was sold in refillable glass bottles. Those
bottles required a deposit and were returned for reuse twenty or
more times. The centralization of the beverage industry, the
increased mobility of our society, and the desire for convenience
have resulted in the virtual disappearance of the reusable bottle. Today,
refillables make up less than 1% of packaged soft drinks and less
than 4% of packaged beer.
There are a number of options for increasing the percentage of
refillable bottles available to consumers. They include the
following:
- public pressure on beer and soft drink companies to make refillables
available;
- introduction of refillable PET plastic soda bottles which are
lightweight and convenient;
- legislation requiring that a certain percentage of beverage
containers be allocated for refillables;
- legislation requiring deposits on all beverage containers;
- differential deposits-full refund for refillable bottles and
partial refund for one-way deposit containers;
- bans or taxes on one-way containers
With a few exceptions, industry has been unwilling to promote refillable
bottles, claiming that customers prefer the convenience of one-way
disposable cans and bottles. A growing chorus of decision-makers in
government, industry and the environmental community is advocating
the promotion of reusable packaging to help stem the ever-increasing
volume of post-consumer waste.
Container Recycling Institute
|