| |
DES MOINES - An epic battle over
the future of the Iowa bottle bill is taking shape. At first
glance it appears that broad agreement exists for expanding the
22-year deposit law to include non-carbonated beverages and increasing
the handling fee.
In reality, one approach would cut
the heart out of the recycling system by effectively eliminating
grocery and convenience stores as redemption sites, reducing
redemption locations for consumers from approximately 3,000 now
to around 100, according to Iowa Recycling Association Executive
Director Dewayne Johnson. Champions of the so-called 'repeal'
approach are Senator Merlin Bartz (R), who introduced SF 194,
and Representative Bob Brunkhorst (R), who introduced HSB 142.
The second approach also expands
the deposit requirements to non-carbonated beverages and raises
the handling fee from one cent to two cents. However, it maintains
the current, widespread system of grocery and convenience store
redemption sites. The second approach, SF 97, introduced by Representative
|
|
Nancy Boettger (R), never got a hearing,
despite a broad base of support.
Supporters of SF 97 include Governor
Tom Vilsack (D), and former Governors Terry Branstad (R) and
Robert D. Ray (R), 21 business leaders and more than a dozen
statewide organizations in the Beautiful Land Coalition. Members
of the coalition include: Iowa State Association of Counties;
Iowa League of Cities; Iowa Recycling Association; Iowa Association
of County Conservation Boards; Iowa Conservation Education Council;
Ecumenical Ministries of Iowa; Iowa United Methodist Church;
and the Iowa Wildlife Federation.
The Bartz and Brunkhorst bills, disguised
as expansion bills, really were repeal measures at heart. Both
bills passed policy committees, but died in the Ways and Means
Committees of each chamber.
A reliable source tells CRI that
the Republican leadership in both the house and senate was committed
to keeping the 'real expansion' bill, SF 97, bottled up. The
battle is expected to resume in 2002.
|
|