| |
Investor proposals pressing management
at The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo Inc. to increase recycling
gained more support than expected at annual shareholder meetings
in 2001, which assures the proposals can be brought back again
next year. For the first time in many years, chief executive
officers from two Fortune 500 companies were compelled to address
recycling issues raised by shareholders.
Management at both Coke and Pepsi
opposed the shareholder resolutions, which call for both companies
to use 25 percent recycled plastic in making new soda bottles
and reach an 80 percent recycling rate for all of their beverage
containers by 2005. However, responses by the two companies to
shareholders revealed major differences in addressing recycling
concerns.
Coca-Cola Chairman and CEO Doug Daft
announced that his company plans to use 10 percent recycled-content
in plastic bottles by 2005 and will work with Businesses and
Environmentalists Allied for Recycling (BEAR) to increase recycling
of beverage containers. While these modest steps disappointed
sponsors of the shareholder resolution and environmentalists,
it was encouraging to see Coke begin to address the growing beverage
container waste problem.
By contrast, Pepsi management sought,
unsuccessfully, to block the shareholder resolution from being
placed on the proxy statement for a vote. Pepsi filed objections
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but the
SEC rejected their request to block it. Pepsi's new chief executive
officer, Steve Reinemund, listened politely to a parade of speakers
voicing support for the recycling proposal, but failed to offer
any commitment to stem the waste of billions of Pepsi bottles
and cans each year
|
|
One possible explanation for the
contrasting positions is that Coke has been subject to a four-year
grassroots campaign on recycling, while Pepsi "has gotten a free
ride," according to GRRN Executive Director Bill Sheehan.
Sheehan told the Pepsi shareholders
that GRRN will begin focusing pressure on PepsiCo Inc. to take
responsibility for its beverage packaging waste. The Container
Recycling Institute teamed up with GRRN and Waste Not Georgia
in organizing support for the shareholder resolutions.
|
|
percent of shareholders refused to
go along with management, either voting 'yes' or abstaining.
PepsiCo Inc. investors holding 83.3
million shares, worth $3.7 billion, voted for the recycling resolution.
Conrad MacKerron, Director of the
Corporate Accountability Program at As You Sow Foundation, and
Ken Scott of Walden Asset Management, sponsors of the resolutions,
called upon Coke and Pepsi management to stop opposing bottle
bills or come up with alternative means to achieve comparable
results.
CRI provided technical support to
shareholder funds developing the resolutions, and CRI Executive
Director Pat Franklin addressed Coke and Pepsi annual shareholder
meetings. She made two key points, that beverage container waste
is growing at an alarming rate - increasing more than 50 percent
since 1992 - and that financial incentives are essential to increase
container recycling.
Shareholder resolutions are non-binding
and typically gain support from a small percentage of total shareholders.
Resolutions still often are a catalyst for meaningful changes
in corporate practices.
The Atlanta Journal Constitution
urged Coca-Cola to take up the recycling challenge contained
in the shareholder resolution, noting that Home Depot and others
have responded positively to pressure from investors.
If real commitments to boost beverage
container recycling fail to materialize, Coke and Pepsi shareholders
have vowed to bring the issue back next year.
|
|
| |
|
An advertisement in the Wall Street
Journal southeast regional edition headlined 'A Moment of Refreshment,
An Eternity of Waste' urged shareholders to support the resolution.
Media campaigns and outreach by investment
funds informed and educated shareholders, and secured meaningful
support for the resolutions.
Investors holding 88.9 million shares
of Coca-Cola stock, worth more than $4 billion, supported the
recycling resolution. Nearly 10
|
|
|