The most recent changes to beverage container regulations in each
province are listed in Table 2 in reverse
chronological order. (Bold designates a move towards greater producer
responsibility.)
While most Canadian provinces have succeeded in expanding or strengthening
regulations covering beverage containers, efforts to expand existing
deposit-return systems or to implement new deposit systems in the
U.S. have failed with the exception of Maine's expansion. Maine
was successful in expanding its deposit law in 1990 to include
all beverage containers with the exception of milk and cider. Canada's
adoption of 'full producer responsibility' has resulted in recovery
rates that far exceed those in the U.S. The exceptions are
the ten states and one municipality that have beverage container
deposit-return systems.
While producers responsibility in Canada typically manifest itself
as a requirement for refundable deposits on beverage containers,
provinces employ a variety of approaches to meet local needs. For
example, there is the distinction that some use a 'return to retail'
approach, some employ 'universal depots' while other use both.
(Universal depots are better known as redemption centers in the
U.S.) Another variation is that Manitoba and Quebec apply
a levy on certain producers to pay the large majority of curbside
recycling costs (albeit producing comparatively low recovery rates.) Table
3 lists the differing approaches to producer responsibility
by province. Ontario is the only province that does not impose
some form of producer responsibility on the large majority of its
beverages.
Another example of differing approaches among the provinces is
the variety of measures in place to encourage or promote refillable
beverage containers. Seven of the ten provinces, accounting
for over 80% of the population, apply some form of levy, fee or
restriction that favors refillables, as can be seen in Table
4.
In summary, to increase recovery, reuse and recycling of beverage
containers:
- All Canadian provinces (with the exception of Ontario) require
a high level of producer responsibility almost always via deposit-return
systems.
- Canada strongly supports refillables; and
- Since 1992, there has been significant momentum to ensure
producer responsibility for beverage container waste.
|