According to data from the Beer Institute, an estimated 3 percent of packaged beer was sold in refillable bottles in the U.S. in 1998. Fifteen states reported a rate of 4 percent or higher. Of those states, 7 were bottle bill states. Nine states reported a rate of 7 percent or higher. Of those, 5 were bottle bill states.
There are 10 bottle bill states and 40 non-bottle bill states. Seventy percent (70%) of the bottle bill states had 7% or more of their packaged beer in refillable bottles in 1998, but only ten percent (10%) of non-bottle bill states had 7% or more of their packaged beer in refillables
Bottle Bill States | Non-Bottle Bill States | |||
Massachusetts | 18% | Pennsylvania | 13% | |
Iowa | 13% | Minnesota | 7% | |
Connecticut | 11% | New Jersey | 7% | |
New York | 8% | Rhode Island | 7% | |
Delaware | 7% |
Bottle Bill States | Non-Bottle Bill States | |||
Maine | 6% | Wisconsin | 6% | |
Oregon | 4% | Colorado | 6% | |
Nebraska | 5% | |||
Indiana | 4% | |||
Source: Based on data from the Beer Institute.
Before the introduction of one-way, disposable containers all fountain soft drinks and draught beer were sold in refillable glass bottles. The disposable steel can made its debut in 1938 and in less than 10 years cans comprised 11 percent of beer market share. Non-refillable glass bottles made up 3 percent and refillable bottles had dropped to 86 percent. By 1984 only 8 percent of beer volume was packaged in refillable bottles. Refillable market share is now less than 4 percent of packaged beer volume.
The soft drink industry was slower to move from a refillable, reusable system to a one-way, disposable system. In 1960 nearly one-half (47 percent) of beer was sold in one-way containers while only 6 percent of soft drinks were sold in one-way bottles and cans. Today less than 1percent of packaged soft drink volume is sold in refillable bottles.
Economic instruments such as deposits allow refillables to compete in the marketplace with one-way, disposable cans and bottles. This is evidenced by data from the Beer Institute which shows that most states with mandatory container deposits have a higher percentage of refillable beer bottles than states without deposit laws. According to the Beer Institute, the market share for refillables dropped to 3.3 percent in 1998. However, in 1998 11 states had a refillable market share of 7 percent or more. Of those 11 states, 7 require deposits on one-way, non-refillable beer and soft drink containers. In one of the deposit states (Massachusetts), 18 percent of total beer volume was sold in refillables in 1998.
Soft Drink Container Mix in the U.S. | |||||
(as a percent of total volume sold) | |||||
Year | Refillable Bottles | NR Bottles | Cans | Plastic Bottles | All one-way Containers |
1947 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1960 | 95 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
1969 | 67 | 13 | 20 | 0 | 33 |
1980 | 31 | 14 | 37 | 18 | 69 |
1984 | 20 | 15 | 41 | 24 | 80 |
1998 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 48.3 | 50.9 | 99.5 |
Source: Can and Bottle Bills, CalPIRG, 1981 for 1947-60 data;1986 Statistical Profile, National Soft Drink Association,1986 for 1969-84 data; Beverage World, June 1999 for1998 data. Note: Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding. |
Beer Container Mix in the U.S. | |||||
(as a percent of total volume sold) | |||||
Year | Refillable Bottles | NR Bottles | Cans | Plastic Bottles | All one-way Containers |
1947 | 86 | 3% | 11 | 0 | 11.03 |
1960 | 53 | 10% | 37 | 0 | 37.1 |
1970 | 26 | 22 | 53 | 0 | 75 |
1980 | 12 | 32 | 56 | 0 | 88 |
1984 | 8 | 26.4 | 65.6 | 0 | 92 |
1998 | 3.3 | 40% | 56.70% | 0 | 97% |
Source: Can and Bottle Bills, CalPIRG, 1981 for 1947-80 data; Beer Institute, 1998 for1984 data, 1999 for 1998 data. NOTE: Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding. |
New beverage container deposit program bills. Expansion and repeal proposals. Sales, redemption rate and waste trends. Refillable bottle infrastructure. Extended producer responsibility.
CRI covers them all – and more – as the leading source of original research, objective analysis and responsible advocacy on the recycling of beverage containers.
Get the latest insights on our Publications and Letters and Briefings pages. Also visit our California DRS page for details on important upgrades made to the state’s beverage container deposit return program, but also the need for additional program reforms – in large part due to misreporting of its fund balance, which diligent work by CRI helped bring to light.
Plus, sign up for our Weekly Headlines e-newsletter for the latest beverage container deposit and recycling industry news, and check back for new information as we continue working to make North America a global model for the collection and quality recycling of packaging materials.
CRI offers a variety of membership and partnership options that provide a wide range of benefits, including complimentary registration to CRI webinars, technical assistance and more.
Review the options on our Memberships & Partnerships page and join us!
Find a wealth of data on metrics such as recycling rates, waste and sales for all beverage container types on CRI’s Data Archive page. Charts and graphs present key information in a user-friendly way.