Deposit/Return Systems

Cutting Beverage Container Waste, A to Z:

Deposit/Return Systems

Deposit/Return systems place a small, fully-refundable deposit (a nickel or a dime) on bottles and cans. When consumers return their empties to a redemption/recycling center, supermarket, or “reverse vending machine,” their deposits are refunded. For most of the 20th century, soda and beer companies voluntarily operated deposit-return systems as a fail-safe way to get their valuable glass bottles back for washing and refilling. These systems were gradually phased out as bottling and distribution became centralized in the 1960s and 1970s. As the quantity and variety of one-way beverage container sales proliferated, so did ugly bottle and can litter.

To address the growing litter problem, in 1971, Oregon became the first state to adopt a mandatory deposit law with a nickel deposit on beer and soda. Vermont, Maine, Iowa, and Michigan followed suit in the 70’s, and Connecticut, Delaware, New York, and Massachusetts adopted deposit laws (also called “bottle bills”) from 1980-1983, followed by California in 1986. During the sixteen-year hiatus which followed, dozens of states tried to pass bottle bills but were defeated by opposition from the well-funded beverage and grocery lobbies. Finally in 2002, Hawaii became the 11th U.S. state to pass a bottle bill.

Bottle bill states have achieved beverage container recycling rates of 70% to 95%, in contrast to the national average of only 35%, which is itself pulled up by the deposit states. The non-deposit states have an average container recycling rate of about 22%, according to the BEAR study in 2002. Deposit-return systems are the most successful recycling programs in the country. They are proven to achieve high recycling rates at no taxpayer expense.

The political obstacles to passing more bottles are formidable, but activists and public and elected officials in at least a dozen states are expected pass a new state law, or to update an existing law to cover non-carbonated beverages in 2006. The beverage, retail, and packaging industries oppose mandatory deposits, and have thus far shown no interest in adopting a voluntary deposit system, as in they did in the past.

Some links:

Curbside Improvement

Cutting Beverage Container Waste,
A to Z:

Curbside Improvement

During the 1990s, curbside recycling in the United States mushroomed from about 2,000 programs serving only 15% of the population to 10,000 programs serving about half of the American population. Whether blue boxes, bags, or buckets are used, curbside recycling is convenient for the consumer, and has been instrumental in recovering large quantities of food containers, newspapers and junk mail, and beverage containers consumed at home.

Unfortunately, the recycling excitement of the 1990s has waned in recent years. The growth of new recycling programs plateaued around 2002, so large chunks of the U.S. population living in dense urban areas, sparsely settled rural areas, or apartment buildings, do not have curbside recycling at all. Within many existing curbside recycling programs, people’s participation has also tapered off, and local government does not have the money to beef up program promotion and enforcement.

Clearly, curbside recycling across the country needs a shot in the arm, or it risks becoming a financial liability for hundreds, if not thousands, of cities and towns.

Non-profit links:

Industry Links:

Bottled Water Alternatives

Totally reusable water bottle on stand-alone purification system!Cutting Beverage Container Waste, A to Z:

Bottled Water Alternatives

Bottled water consumption has grown more sharply than any other beverage type. Between 1976 and 1996, U.S. bottled water consumption increased 10-fold: from 337 million gallons to 3.2 billion gallons. By 2002 it surpassed 5 billion gallons. In terms of individual bottles sold, water consumption grew from about 3 billion units in 1997 to about 23 billion in 2004, and probably more than 25 billion in 2005.

Bottled water consumption continues to grow, as the public’s appetite for it appears to be insatiable. Many organizations and news sources have profiled the growth of bottled water, and are concerned about it not only for environmental reasons (since fewer than 15% of PET plastic water bottles are currently recycled), but because society’s acceptance of drinking bottled water threatens to undermine the importance of maintaining safe public drinking water supplies and threatens the sustainability of safe water supplies.

Offices and institutions can promote the use of water coolers and water fountains. At the individual level, people can install filters on their kitchen faucets, or use tabletop filtered pitchers, to improve the taste of their local tap water. Best yet, citizens can become involved in efforts to monitor and improve the quality of their municipal water supply. If this is impossible in the short-term, 3-gallon jugs of water from the supermarket, or 5-gallon coolers by subscription, are at least a better alternative than single-serving plastic water bottles. Some supermarkets and freestanding water stations provide consumers with an opportunity to refill their containers.

Some links:

Some products

  • Mirage Water Maker: Makes drinking water from water in the air
  • Sigg aluminum bottles: Why use flimsy plastic bottles when you can use durable aluminum? *product submitted by Constanza Zordan
  • www.watermillexpress.com: Customers vend 1, 3 or 5 gallons of water into their own clean bottles
  • Xziex: Machines that create clean drinking water by condensing and purifying atmospheric humidity

Alternatives to packaged beverages

Starbucks mugAchieving Zero Beverage Container Waste, A to Z:

Alternatives to packaged beverages

Daily consumption of packaged beverages has become the norm for the average American.

From 1960-1970, the average person bought 200-250 packaged drinks each year, and many of those were in refillable bottles. Before the late 1960’s, fountain drinks, draft beer, and water fountains complemented people’s at-home consumption. As refillables were phased out, as technology developed to enable single-serving plastic bottles, and as industry marketing efforts were ramped up, packaged beverage consumption grew and grew.

By 1990 it reached 546 bottles and cans per capita, and by 2000 it surpassed 600 (view a graph). CRI now estimates that the average person in the United States will consume 686 beverage bottles and cans in 2006. Note that this is an average for every person in the country. Because many segments of the population cannot possibly consume this much—including infants and toddlers, the sick or elderly, or the incarcerated, for example—it follows that most children and adults are actually consuming far more than the national average: or more than two packaged beverages every single day.

Is it time to question our consumption of packaged soft drinks, juices, sports drinks, and teas? What would happen if we filled our children’s thermoses with juice from a large jug, like our mothers did 30 years ago? If we made conscious decisions to buy family-size rather than single-serving size bottles of soda and juice? If we chose to drink from the water cooler at work instead of from a new plastic bottle? These choices would surely save money for the average American, and they would also reduce energy and resource consumption. There are also health benefits of reducing our consumption of sugary sodas, as well as diet drinks.

Some Links:

Popular Links

  • Publications
  • CRI Memberships
  • Data Archive

New beverage container deposit program bills. Expansion and repeal proposals. Sales, redemption rate and waste trends. Refillable bottle infrastructure. Extended producer responsibility.

CRI covers them all – and more – as the leading source of original research, objective analysis and responsible advocacy on the recycling of beverage containers.

Get the latest insights on our Publications and Letters and Briefings pages. Also visit our California Crisis page for details on the extensive shortcomings of the state’s beverage container deposit program – and ways to help fix them.

Plus, sign up for our Weekly Headlines e-newsletter for the latest beverage container deposit and recycling industry news, and check back for new information as we continue working to make North America a global model for the collection and quality recycling of packaging materials.

CRI offers a variety of membership and partnership options that provide a wide range of benefits, including complimentary registration to CRI webinars, technical assistance and more.

Review the options on our Memberships & Partnerships page and join us!

Find a wealth of data on metrics such as recycling rates, waste and sales for all beverage container types on CRI’s Data Archive page. Charts and graphs present key information in a user-friendly way.

donate_red_allcaps_black



Learn how CRI made a difference in 2023 through high-profile initiatives, legislative analysis and advocacy, and education and collaboration.










 

 

This counter represents the number of beverage cans and bottles that have been landfilled, littered and incinerated in the US so far this year
Scroll To Top